GeForce GT 340 vs Radeon R7 A8-8650

CPU

GPU

GeForce GT 340

2014Core: 993 MHz

Buy on Amazon

Radeon R7 A8-8650

2014Core: 725 MHzBoost: 825 MHz

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GT 340 vs Radeon R7 A8-8650 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GT 340

1 GB 64

738

+2.6%

GeForce 8800 GTS

GeForce 9800 GTX+

GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+

GeForce GT 735M

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

Radeon R7 A8-8650

0.5 GB 30

719

0.0%

Radeon HD 3850

Mobility Radeon HD 5000 Serisi

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 340 vs Radeon R7 A8-8650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 340 vs Radeon R7 A8-8650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 340

2014

Why buy it

✅3.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
104.1% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.4 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌113.3% higher power demand at 64W vs 30W.

Radeon R7 A8-8650

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 98.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.7 vs 7.4 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 64W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 340 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 340 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (738 vs 719), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 340 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 A8-8650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $51 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 98.8% (14.7 vs 7.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 A8-8650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 340 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 340 vs Radeon R7 A8-8650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 340

The GeForce GT 340 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 738 points. Launch price was $89.

Radeon R7 A8-8650

The Radeon R7 A8-8650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 719 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 340 scores 738 and the Radeon R7 A8-8650 reaches 719 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 340 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 A8-8650 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 340) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 340) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-8650).

Feature	GeForce GT 340	Radeon R7 A8-8650
G3D Mark Score	738+3%	719
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7626 TFLOPS+20%	0.6336 TFLOPS
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	32+33%	24
L1 Cache	32 KB	96 KB+200%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 340 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 A8-8650 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 340	Radeon R7 A8-8650
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 340 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A8-8650 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 340 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 340 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A8-8650.

Feature	GeForce GT 340	Radeon R7 A8-8650
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 340) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GT 340	Radeon R7 A8-8650
DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 (12_0)+8%
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
OpenGL	3.3	4.6+39%
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 340) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 340) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 A8-8650).

Feature	GeForce GT 340	Radeon R7 A8-8650
Encoder	None	VCE 2.0
Decoder	VP4	UVD 6.0
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 340 draws 64W versus the Radeon R7 A8-8650's 30W — a 72.3% difference. The Radeon R7 A8-8650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 340) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 72.

Feature	GeForce GT 340	Radeon R7 A8-8650
TDP	64W	30W-53%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75	72-4%
Perf/Watt	11.5	24.0+109%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 340 came in at $100, while the Radeon R7 A8-8650 launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A8-8650 was 51% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.4 (GeForce GT 340) vs 14.7 (Radeon R7 A8-8650) — the Radeon R7 A8-8650 offers 98.6% better value.

Feature	GeForce GT 340	Radeon R7 A8-8650
MSRP	$100	$49-51%
Performance per Dollar	7.4	14.7+99%
Codename	GK107	Opal
Release	May 29 2014	January 9 2014
Ranking	#777	#890

Search GeForce GT 340 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 A8-8650 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.