A10-7800 vs Pentium Gold 4417U

AMD

A10-7800

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium Gold 4417U

2 Cores4 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······

A10-7800 vs Pentium Gold 4417U Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-7800 vs Pentium Gold 4417U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-7800 vs Pentium Gold 4417U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-7800

2014

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Pentium Gold 4417U needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium Gold 4417U.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (3,213 vs 3,240).
  • 6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.

Pentium Gold 4417U

2019

Why buy it

  • +0.8% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-7800 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Launch MSRP is still $161 MSRP, while A10-7800 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • No integrated graphics, while A10-7800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-7800.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium Gold 4417U better than A10-7800?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-7800 is ahead with a 7.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Gold 4417U pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Gold 4417U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium Gold 4417U is the better buy right now. Pentium Gold 4417U comes in at an unclear MSRP at $161 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that A10-7800 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (20.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium Gold 4417U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-7800 vs Pentium Gold 4417U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

A10-7800

The A10-7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,213 points. Launch price was $130.

Intel

Pentium Gold 4417U

The Pentium Gold 4417U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,240 points. Launch price was $161.

Processing Power

The A10-7800 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium Gold 4417U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-7800 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A10-7800 versus 2.3 GHz on the Pentium Gold 4417U — a 51.6% clock advantage for the A10-7800 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The A10-7800 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium Gold 4417U uses Kaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7800 scores 3,213 against the Pentium Gold 4417U's 3,240 — a 0.8% lead for the Pentium Gold 4417U.

FeatureA10-7800Pentium Gold 4417U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+70%
2.3 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+52%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB
L2 Cache
4096 kB+300%
1 MB
Process
28 nm
14 nm-50%
Architecture
Kaveri (2014−2015)
Kaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019)
PassMark
3,213
3,240
Geekbench 6 Single
452
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7800 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Gold 4417U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA10-7800Pentium Gold 4417U
Socket
FM2+
BGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-2133
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-7800) / not specified (Pentium Gold 4417U). The A10-7800 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Pentium Gold 4417U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7800 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-7800 rivals Core i3-4150.

FeatureA10-7800Pentium Gold 4417U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget