A10-7800 vs Core i7-4600M

A10-7800 vs Core i7-4600M Performance Spectrum

A10-7800

4 / 4

3,213

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-4600M

2 / 4

3,204

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-7800 vs Core i7-4600M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-7800 vs Core i7-4600M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-7800

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-4600M.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i7-4600M

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-7800 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,204 vs 3,213).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-7800.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-7800 better than Core i7-4600M?

Yes. A10-7800 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-7800 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-7800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-7800 still makes the most sense overall. A10-7800 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-7800 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-7800 vs Core i7-4600M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-7800

The A10-7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,213 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i7-4600M

The Core i7-4600M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,204 points. Launch price was $346.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-7800 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-4600M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-7800 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A10-7800 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-4600M — a 8% clock advantage for the A10-7800 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A10-7800 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-4600M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7800 scores 3,213 against the Core i7-4600M's 3,204 — a 0.3% lead for the A10-7800. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 452 vs 1,025, a 77.6% lead for the Core i7-4600M that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A10-7800	Core i7-4600M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+8%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+21%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256K (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,213	3,204
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	656
Geekbench 6 Single	452	1,025+127%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	2,132

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7800 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4600M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A10-7800 versus DDR3L 1600 MHz on the Core i7-4600M — the A10-7800 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A70M,A75,A78,A88X (A10-7800) and Intel HM86,Intel HM87,Intel QM87 (Core i7-4600M).

Feature	A10-7800	Core i7-4600M
Socket	FM2+	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133+33%	DDR3L 1600 MHz
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-7800) vs true (Core i7-4600M). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R7 (A10-7800) and Intel HD Graphics 4600 (Core i7-4600M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7800 targets Budget, Core i7-4600M targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A10-7800 rivals Core i3-4150.