Core i5-6260U vs FX-770K

Core i5-6260U vs FX-770K Performance Spectrum

Core i5-6260U

2 / 4

3,200

+0.9%

3,172

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-6260U vs FX-770K FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-6260U vs FX-770K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-6260U

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Graphics 540, while FX-770K needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-770K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

FX-770K

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,172 vs 3,200).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-6260U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-6260U better than FX-770K?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-770K is ahead with a 10.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6260U pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6260U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-6260U still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-6260U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-6260U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-6260U vs FX-770K Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-6260U

The Core i5-6260U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,200 points. Launch price was $304.

FX-770K

The FX-770K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Dezembro 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,172 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-6260U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-770K offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-770K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-6260U versus 3.9 GHz on the FX-770K — a 29.4% clock advantage for the FX-770K (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-6260U uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-770K uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6260U scores 3,200 against the FX-770K's 3,172 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-6260U.

Feature	Core i5-6260U	FX-770K
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.9 GHz+34%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	3.5 GHz+94%
L3 Cache	4 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	4 MB+700%
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Kaveri (2014−2015)
PassMark	3,200	3,172
Geekbench 6 Single	979	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-6260U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-770K uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-6260U	FX-770K
Socket	BGA1356	FM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-6260U) / not specified (FX-770K). The Core i5-6260U includes integrated graphics (Iris Graphics 540), while the FX-770K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6260U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-6260U rivals A12-9720P.