Core i5-6287U
VS
Core i7-2840QM

Core i5-6287U vs Core i7-2840QM

Intel

Core i5-6287U

2 Cores4 Thrd28 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Core i7-2840QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-6287U is positioned at rank 470 and the Core i7-2840QM is on rank 311, so the Core i7-2840QM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-6287U

#458
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
618%
#459
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
609%
#460
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
559%
#461
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
556%
#462
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
551%
#464
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
532%
#465
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
510%
#466
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
509%
#467
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
496%
#470
Core i5-6287U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#472
Ryzen Embedded R1505G
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2840QM

#299
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
458%
#300
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
452%
#301
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
414%
#302
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
413%
#303
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
409%
#305
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
395%
#306
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
379%
#307
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
378%
#308
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
368%
#311
Core i7-2840QM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-6287U leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-2840QM is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-6287UCore i7-2840QM
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-6287UCore i7-2840QM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-6287U and Core i7-2840QM

Intel

Core i5-6287U

The Core i5-6287U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,801 points. Launch price was $304.

Intel

Core i7-2840QM

The Core i7-2840QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 3,842 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i5-6287U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-2840QM offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-2840QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-6287U versus 2.4 GHz on the Core i7-2840QM — a 37.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-6287U. The Core i5-6287U uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-2840QM uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6287U scores 3,801 against the Core i7-2840QM's 3,842 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-2840QM. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i5-6287U vs 8 MB on the Core i7-2840QM.

FeatureCore i5-6287UCore i7-2840QM
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz+46%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
8 MB+100%
L2 Cache
512 kB
1 MB+100%
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
3,801
3,842+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
816
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-6287U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2840QM uses G2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-6287UCore i7-2840QM
Socket
BGA1356
G2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-6287U) / not specified (Core i7-2840QM). The Core i5-6287U includes integrated graphics (Iris Graphics 550), while the Core i7-2840QM requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6287U targets High Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-6287U rivals FX-9800P.

FeatureCore i5-6287UCore i7-2840QM
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Graphics 550
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
High Performance Laptop