Core i3-10110U vs Core i5-6287U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10110U vs Core i5-6287U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10110U vs Core i5-6287U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10110U

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 25W instead of 28W, a 3W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i5-6287U

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-10110U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,801 vs 3,839).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10110U better than Core i5-6287U?

Yes. Core i3-10110U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-10110U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10110U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-10110U still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-10110U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10110U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-10110U vs Core i5-6287U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10110U

The Core i3-10110U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,839 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-6287U

The Core i5-6287U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,801 points. Launch price was $304.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-10110U and Core i5-6287U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i3-10110U versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-6287U — a 15.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-10110U (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i3-10110U uses the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-6287U uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10110U scores 3,839 against the Core i5-6287U's 3,801 — a 1% lead for the Core i3-10110U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,270 vs 816, a 43.5% lead for the Core i3-10110U that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-10110U vs 4 MB on the Core i5-6287U.

Feature	Core i3-10110U	Core i5-6287U
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+17%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.1 GHz+48%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	3,839	3,801
Cinebench R23 Multi	2,327	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,270+56%	816
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,353	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10110U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-6287U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i3-10110U versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-6287U — the Core i3-10110U supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-10110U supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-10110U) vs 12 (Core i5-6287U) — the Core i3-10110U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core i3-10110U) and Skylake-U (Core i5-6287U).

Feature	Core i3-10110U	Core i5-6287U
Socket	FCBGA1528	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666+25%	DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics for 10th Gen (Core i3-10110U) and Iris Graphics 550 (Core i5-6287U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-10110U targets Productivity, Core i5-6287U targets High Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-10110U rivals Ryzen 3 3200U; Core i5-6287U rivals FX-9800P.

Feature	Core i3-10110U	Core i5-6287U
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics for 10th Gen	Iris Graphics 550
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Productivity	High Performance Laptop