Core i3-10110U vs FX-6120

Core i3-10110U vs FX-6120 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-10110U

2 / 4

3,839

0.0%

3,853

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10110U vs FX-6120 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10110U vs FX-6120: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10110U

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 25W instead of 95W, a 70W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics for 10th Gen, while FX-6120 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,839 vs 3,853).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

FX-6120

2012

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $188 MSRP, while Core i3-10110U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌280% higher power demand at 95W vs 25W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-10110U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-6120 better than Core i3-10110U?

Yes. FX-6120 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-6120 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-6120 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-6120 is the better buy right now. FX-6120 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $188 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (20.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10110U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-10110U vs FX-6120 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10110U

The Core i3-10110U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,839 points. Launch price was $69.

FX-6120

The FX-6120 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,853 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-10110U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-6120 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6120 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i3-10110U versus 4.2 GHz on the FX-6120 — a 2.4% clock advantage for the FX-6120 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i3-10110U uses the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-6120 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10110U scores 3,839 against the FX-6120's 3,853 — a 0.4% lead for the FX-6120. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-10110U vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-6120.

Feature	Core i3-10110U	FX-6120
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	6 / 6+200%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz	4.2 GHz+2%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.6 GHz+71%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+4167%	6 MB
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark	3,839	3,853
Cinebench R23 Multi	2,327	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,270	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,353	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10110U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-6120 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-10110U	FX-6120
Socket	FCBGA1528	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-10110U) / not specified (FX-6120). The Core i3-10110U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 10th Gen), while the FX-6120 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-10110U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i3-10110U rivals Ryzen 3 3200U.