Athlon 300U vs Core i3-10110U

AMD

Athlon 300U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i3-10110U

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2019
Core family
·······

Athlon 300U vs Core i3-10110U Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 300U vs Core i3-10110U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 300U vs Core i3-10110U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 300U

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (900 vs 1,270).
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,800 vs 2,353).

Core i3-10110U

2019

Why buy it

  • +41.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
  • 33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10110U better than Athlon 300U?
Yes. Core i3-10110U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 30.7% better Geekbench multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i3-10110U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10110U is the stronger fit. You are getting 30.7% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-10110U still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-10110U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-10110U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 300U vs Core i3-10110U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon 300U

The Athlon 300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,861 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i3-10110U

The Core i3-10110U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,839 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 300U and Core i3-10110U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Athlon 300U versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i3-10110U — a 21.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-10110U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Athlon 300U uses the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-10110U uses Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 300U scores 3,861 against the Core i3-10110U's 3,839 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon 300U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 900 vs 1,270, a 34.1% lead for the Core i3-10110U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,800 vs 2,353 (26.6% advantage for the Core i3-10110U). Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon 300UCore i3-10110U
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
4.1 GHz+24%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+14%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Raven Ridge 2 (2019)
Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)
PassMark
3,861
3,839
Cinebench R23 Multi
2,327
Geekbench 6 Single
900
1,270+41%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,800
2,353+31%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 300U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-10110U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Athlon 300U versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i3-10110U — the Core i3-10110U supports 11.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-10110U supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Athlon 300U) vs 16 (Core i3-10110U) — the Core i3-10110U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP5 (Athlon 300U) and SoC (Core i3-10110U).

FeatureAthlon 300UCore i3-10110U
Socket
FP5
FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
DDR4-2666+11%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
64 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
12
16+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon 300U) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-10110U). Both include integrated graphics Radeon RX Vega 3 (Athlon 300U) and UHD Graphics for 10th Gen (Core i3-10110U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 300U targets Budget Laptop, Core i3-10110U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i3-10110U rivals Ryzen 3 3200U.

FeatureAthlon 300UCore i3-10110U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon RX Vega 3
UHD Graphics for 10th Gen
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Budget Laptop
Productivity