Athlon 300U vs Athlon Gold 3150U

Athlon 300U vs Athlon Gold 3150U Performance Spectrum

Athlon 300U

2 / 4

3,861

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon Gold 3150U

2 / 4

3,923

+1.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 300U vs Athlon Gold 3150U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 300U vs Athlon Gold 3150U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 300U

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅50% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,861 vs 3,923).

Athlon Gold 3150U

2020

Why buy it

✅+1.6% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon 300U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon Gold 3150U better than Athlon 300U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon 300U is ahead with a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Gold 3150U pulls ahead with 1.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Gold 3150U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon Gold 3150U still makes the most sense overall. Athlon Gold 3150U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.6% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon Gold 3150U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 300U vs Athlon Gold 3150U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 300U

The Athlon 300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,861 points. Launch price was $149.

Athlon Gold 3150U

The Athlon Gold 3150U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,923 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 300U and Athlon Gold 3150U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Athlon 300U versus 3.3 GHz on the Athlon Gold 3150U — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Athlon 300U uses the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Athlon Gold 3150U uses Dali (Zen) (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 300U scores 3,861 against the Athlon Gold 3150U's 3,923 — a 1.6% lead for the Athlon Gold 3150U. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon 300U	Athlon Gold 3150U
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Raven Ridge 2 (2019)	Dali (Zen) (2020)
PassMark	3,861	3,923+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	900	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,800	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FP5 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Athlon 300U) vs 8 (Athlon Gold 3150U) — the Athlon 300U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP5 (Athlon 300U) and AMD FP5 (Athlon Gold 3150U).

Feature	Athlon 300U	Athlon Gold 3150U
Socket	FP5	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	12+50%	8

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon 300U) / not specified (Athlon Gold 3150U). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon RX Vega 3 (Athlon 300U) and AMD Radeon Vega 3 (Athlon Gold 3150U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 300U targets Budget Laptop.