Athlon 300U
VS
Processor N200

Athlon 300U vs Processor N200

AMD

Athlon 300U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Processor N200

4 Cores4 Thrd0 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 300U is positioned at rank 624 and the Processor N200 is on rank 204, so the Processor N200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 300U

#612
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
836%
#613
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
824%
#614
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
756%
#615
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
753%
#616
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
746%
#618
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
720%
#619
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
691%
#620
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
689%
#621
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
671%
#624
Athlon 300U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#625
Core 3 N355
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#628
Core i5-1335UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
100%
#638
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Processor N200

#192
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
373%
#193
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
367%
#194
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
337%
#195
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
336%
#196
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
332%
#198
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
321%
#199
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
308%
#200
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
307%
#201
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
299%
#204
Processor N200
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Processor N200 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Athlon 300U in both compute-intensive tasks (1.9% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAthlon 300UProcessor N200
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raven Ridge 2 (2019) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Alder Lake-N (2023) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon 300UProcessor N200
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 300U and Processor N200

AMD

Athlon 300U

The Athlon 300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,861 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Processor N200

The Processor N200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,937 points. Launch price was $193.

Processing Power

The Athlon 300U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Processor N200 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Processor N200 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Athlon 300U versus 3.7 GHz on the Processor N200 — a 11.4% clock advantage for the Processor N200 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 0.1 GHz). The Athlon 300U uses the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Processor N200 uses Alder Lake-N (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 300U scores 3,861 against the Processor N200's 3,937 — a 1.9% lead for the Processor N200. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon 300U vs 6 MB (total) on the Processor N200.

FeatureAthlon 300UProcessor N200
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz+12%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+2300%
0.1 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
2 MB (total)+300%
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Raven Ridge 2 (2019)
Alder Lake-N (2023)
PassMark
3,861
3,937+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
900
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,800
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 300U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Processor N200 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon 300UProcessor N200
Socket
FP5
FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon 300U) / not specified (Processor N200). The Athlon 300U includes integrated graphics (Radeon RX Vega 3), while the Processor N200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 300U targets Budget Laptop.

FeatureAthlon 300UProcessor N200
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon RX Vega 3
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Laptop