
Athlon 300U

Core i3-4370
Athlon 300U vs Core i3-4370 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 300U vs Core i3-4370 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon 300U vs Core i3-4370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 300U
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 54W, a 39W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (900 vs 904).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,800 vs 2,071).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4370.
Core i3-4370
2014Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Athlon 300U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $149 MSRP, while Athlon 300U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌260% higher power demand at 54W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-4370 better than Athlon 300U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 300U vs Core i3-4370 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 300U
The Athlon 300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,861 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i3-4370
The Core i3-4370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,854 points. Launch price was $242.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 300U and Core i3-4370 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Athlon 300U versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i3-4370 — a 14.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-4370 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Athlon 300U uses the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-4370 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 300U scores 3,861 against the Core i3-4370's 3,854 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon 300U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 900 vs 904, a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-4370 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,800 vs 2,071 (14% advantage for the Core i3-4370). Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon 300U | Core i3-4370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.8 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz+58% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Raven Ridge 2 (2019) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 3,861 | 3,854 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 2,454 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 900 | 904 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,800 | 2,071+15% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 300U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4370 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Athlon 300U versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4370 — the Athlon 300U supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Athlon 300U) vs 16 (Core i3-4370) — the Core i3-4370 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP5 (Athlon 300U) and Intel H81,Intel B85,Intel H87,Intel Z87,Intel H97,Intel Z97 (Core i3-4370).
| Feature | Athlon 300U | Core i3-4370 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP5 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+50% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 16+33% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon 300U) vs true (Core i3-4370). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon RX Vega 3 (Athlon 300U) and Intel HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4370) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 300U targets Budget Laptop.
| Feature | Athlon 300U | Core i3-4370 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon RX Vega 3 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Budget Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















