Athlon 300U vs Ryzen Embedded R2312

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 300U vs Ryzen Embedded R2312 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 300U vs Ryzen Embedded R2312: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 300U

2019

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon RX Vega 3, while Ryzen Embedded R2312 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,861 vs 3,952).

Ryzen Embedded R2312

2022

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Athlon 300U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon 300U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded R2312 better than Athlon 300U?

Yes. Ryzen Embedded R2312 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Embedded R2312 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded R2312 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded R2312 is the better buy right now. Ryzen Embedded R2312 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (26.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded R2312 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 300U vs Ryzen Embedded R2312 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 300U

The Athlon 300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,861 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen Embedded R2312

The Ryzen Embedded R2312 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 June 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,952 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 300U and Ryzen Embedded R2312 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Athlon 300U versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R2312 — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded R2312 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Athlon 300U uses the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R2312 uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 300U scores 3,861 against the Ryzen Embedded R2312's 3,952 — a 2.3% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R2312. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon 300U	Ryzen Embedded R2312
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.5 GHz+6%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.7 GHz+13%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	12 nm-14%
Architecture	Raven Ridge 2 (2019)	Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark	3,861	3,952+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	900	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,800	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FP5 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Athlon 300U	Ryzen Embedded R2312
Socket	FP5	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon 300U) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded R2312). The Athlon 300U includes integrated graphics (Radeon RX Vega 3), while the Ryzen Embedded R2312 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 300U targets Budget Laptop.