Athlon 300U
VS
FX-6120

Athlon 300U vs FX-6120

AMD

Athlon 300U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2019
VS
AMD

FX-6120

6 Cores6 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 300U is positioned at rank 624 and the FX-6120 is on rank 787, so the Athlon 300U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 300U

#612
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
836%
#613
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
824%
#614
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
756%
#615
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
753%
#616
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
746%
#618
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
720%
#619
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
691%
#620
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
689%
#621
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
671%
#624
Athlon 300U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#625
Core 3 N355
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#628
Core i5-1335UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
100%
#638
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar FX-6120

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
15213%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14375%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10437%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3144%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2491%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2179%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1248%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1232%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1121%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1121%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1109%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1079%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1064%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1059%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1050%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
96%
#393
Core i3-9300T
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
100%
#394
Ryzen 3 2200GE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#787
FX-6120
MSRP: $188|Avg: $54
100%
#788
Core i7-6700TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $175
100%
#790
Athlon II X4 620
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
100%
#791
Core i7-3820
MSRP: $286|Avg: $30
99%
#792
Athlon II X3 425
MSRP: $79|Avg: $5
99%
#793
Athlon II X2 255
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
98%
#794
Core i3-3245
MSRP: $120|Avg: $50
98%
#796
FX-4170
MSRP: $157|Avg: $23
97%
#798
Athlon II X3 415e
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
96%
#799
Core i5-2300
MSRP: $177|Avg: $17
96%
#800
Core i7-4820K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $40
96%
#802
Core i7-3770K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $75
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Athlon 300U (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Dual-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAthlon 300UFX-6120
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($54)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raven Ridge 2 (2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-6120 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAthlon 300UFX-6120
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($54)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 300U and FX-6120

AMD

Athlon 300U

The Athlon 300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,861 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

FX-6120

The FX-6120 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,853 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Athlon 300U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-6120 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6120 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Athlon 300U versus 4.2 GHz on the FX-6120 — a 24% clock advantage for the FX-6120 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Athlon 300U uses the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-6120 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 300U scores 3,861 against the FX-6120's 3,853 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon 300U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon 300U vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-6120.

FeatureAthlon 300UFX-6120
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
6 / 6+200%
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
4.2 GHz+27%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz+50%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
6 MB+1100%
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Raven Ridge 2 (2019)
Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark
3,861
3,853
Geekbench 6 Single
900
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,800
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 300U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-6120 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon 300UFX-6120
Socket
FP5
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon 300U) / not specified (FX-6120). The Athlon 300U includes integrated graphics (Radeon RX Vega 3), while the FX-6120 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 300U targets Budget Laptop.

FeatureAthlon 300UFX-6120
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon RX Vega 3
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Laptop