Core i3-10110U vs Opteron 4332 HE

Core i3-10110U vs Opteron 4332 HE Performance Spectrum

Core i3-10110U

2 / 4

3,839

0.0%

3,911

+1.9%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10110U vs Opteron 4332 HE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10110U vs Opteron 4332 HE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10110U

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 25W instead of 65W, a 40W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics for 10th Gen, while Opteron 4332 HE needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,839 vs 3,911).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 4332 HE, which brings 6 cores / 6 threads.

Opteron 4332 HE

2012

Why buy it

✅+1.9% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 6 threads.

Trade-offs

❌160% higher power demand at 65W vs 25W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-10110U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10110U better than Opteron 4332 HE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 4332 HE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-10110U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 4332 HE is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-10110U still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-10110U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10110U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-10110U vs Opteron 4332 HE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10110U

The Core i3-10110U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,839 points. Launch price was $69.

Opteron 4332 HE

The Opteron 4332 HE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Seoul (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: C32. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,911 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-10110U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 4332 HE offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Opteron 4332 HE has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i3-10110U versus 3.7 GHz on the Opteron 4332 HE — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-10110U (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i3-10110U uses the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 4332 HE uses Seoul (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10110U scores 3,839 against the Opteron 4332 HE's 3,911 — a 1.9% lead for the Opteron 4332 HE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-10110U vs 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 4332 HE.

Feature	Core i3-10110U	Opteron 4332 HE
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	6 / 6+200%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+11%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3 GHz+43%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8192 kB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	6144 kB+2300%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)	Seoul (2012)
PassMark	3,839	3,911+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi	2,327	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,270	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,353	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10110U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 4332 HE uses C32 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-10110U	Opteron 4332 HE
Socket	FCBGA1528	C32
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-10110U) / not specified (Opteron 4332 HE). The Core i3-10110U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 10th Gen), while the Opteron 4332 HE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-10110U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i3-10110U rivals Ryzen 3 3200U.