
Core i3-4370

Core i3-10110U
Core i3-4370 vs Core i3-10110U Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-4370 vs Core i3-10110U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-4370 vs Core i3-10110U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-4370
2014Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-10110U.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $149 MSRP, while Core i3-10110U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β116% higher power demand at 54W vs 25W.
Core i3-10110U
2019Why buy it
- β Draws 25W instead of 54W, a 29W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4370 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (2,327 vs 2,454).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4370.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-4370 better than Core i3-10110U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-4370 vs Core i3-10110U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4370
The Core i3-4370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013β2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,854 points. Launch price was $242.

Core i3-10110U
The Core i3-10110U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019β2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,839 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-4370 and Core i3-10110U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i3-4370 versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i3-10110U β a 7.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-10110U (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i3-4370 uses the Haswell (2013β2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-10110U uses Comet Lake-U (2019β2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4370 scores 3,854 against the Core i3-10110U's 3,839 β a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-4370. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 2,454 vs 2,327 (5.3% advantage for the Core i3-4370). Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 904 vs 1,270, a 33.7% lead for the Core i3-10110U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,071 vs 2,353 (12.7% advantage for the Core i3-10110U). Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i3-4370 | Core i3-10110U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.1 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+81% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013β2015) | Comet Lake-U (2019β2020) |
| PassMark | 3,854 | 3,839 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 2,454+5% | 2,327 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 904 | 1,270+40% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,071 | 2,353+14% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-4370 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-10110U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4370 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i3-10110U β the Core i3-10110U supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-10110U supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel H81,Intel B85,Intel H87,Intel Z87,Intel H97,Intel Z97 (Core i3-4370) and SoC (Core i3-10110U).
| Feature | Core i3-4370 | Core i3-10110U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | FCBGA1528 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR4-2666+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Core i3-4370) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-10110U). Both include integrated graphics β Intel HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4370) and UHD Graphics for 10th Gen (Core i3-10110U) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-10110U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i3-10110U rivals Ryzen 3 3200U.
| Feature | Core i3-4370 | Core i3-10110U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | UHD Graphics for 10th Gen |
| Unlocked | β | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | β | Productivity |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













