Core i3-4370 vs Processor N200

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4370 vs Processor N200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4370 vs Processor N200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4370

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4600, while Processor N200 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Processor N200.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,854 vs 3,937).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $149 MSRP, while Processor N200 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on LGA1150, while Processor N200 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Processor N200

2023

Why buy it

✅+2.2% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1150 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4370 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4370 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4370.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4370 better than Processor N200?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-4370 is ahead with a 5.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Processor N200 pulls ahead with 2.2% better PassMark. Processor N200 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Processor N200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4370 is the better buy right now. Core i3-4370 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $149 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Processor N200 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (25.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Processor N200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2014), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of LGA1150, 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i3-4370 vs Processor N200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4370

The Core i3-4370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,854 points. Launch price was $242.

Processor N200

The Processor N200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,937 points. Launch price was $193.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4370 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Processor N200 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Processor N200 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i3-4370 versus 3.7 GHz on the Processor N200 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-4370 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 0.1 GHz). The Core i3-4370 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Processor N200 uses Alder Lake-N (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4370 scores 3,854 against the Processor N200's 3,937 — a 2.1% lead for the Processor N200. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4370 vs 6 MB (total) on the Processor N200.

Feature	Core i3-4370	Processor N200
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+3%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+3700%	0.1 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2 MB (total)+700%
Process	22 nm	10 nm-55%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Alder Lake-N (2023)
PassMark	3,854	3,937+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi	2,454	—
Geekbench 6 Single	904	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,071	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4370 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Processor N200 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-4370	Processor N200
Socket	LGA1150	FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i3-4370) / not specified (Processor N200). The Core i3-4370 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4600), while the Processor N200 requires a dedicated GPU.