Core i5-6287U vs Core i7-7560U

Intel

Core i5-6287U

2 Cores4 Thrd28 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-7560U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-6287U vs Core i7-7560U Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-6287U vs Core i7-7560U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-6287U vs Core i7-7560U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-6287U

2015

Why buy it

  • +1.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • 86.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 15W.

Core i7-7560U

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 28W, a 13W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (3,760 vs 3,801).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-7560U better than Core i5-6287U?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-7560U is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6287U pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6287U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-7560U still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-7560U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-7560U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-6287U vs Core i7-7560U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-6287U

The Core i5-6287U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,801 points. Launch price was $304.

Intel

Core i7-7560U

The Core i7-7560U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,760 points. Launch price was $415.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-6287U and Core i7-7560U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-6287U versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-7560U — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-7560U (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-6287U uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-7560U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6287U scores 3,801 against the Core i7-7560U's 3,760 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-6287U. Both processors carry 4 MB of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i5-6287UCore i7-7560U
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
3.8 GHz+9%
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+29%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
3,801+1%
3,760
Geekbench 6 Single
816
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the BGA1356 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2133 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 12 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Skylake-U (Core i5-6287U) and Kaby Lake-U (Core i7-7560U).

FeatureCore i5-6287UCore i7-7560U
Socket
BGA1356
BGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
2133
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
12
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-6287U) vs true (Core i7-7560U). Both include integrated graphics Iris Graphics 550 (Core i5-6287U) and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 (Core i7-7560U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6287U targets High Performance Laptop, Core i7-7560U targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-6287U rivals FX-9800P.

FeatureCore i5-6287UCore i7-7560U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Graphics 550
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
true
Target Use
High Performance Laptop
Mobile