Core i5-6300HQ vs Core i5-7400T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-6300HQ vs Core i5-7400T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-6300HQ vs Core i5-7400T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-6300HQ

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-7400T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,672 vs 4,692).
❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-7400T.

Core i5-7400T

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-6300HQ.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $182 MSRP, while Core i5-6300HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-7400T better than Core i5-6300HQ?

Yes. Core i5-7400T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-7400T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7400T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-7400T is the better buy right now. Core i5-7400T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $182 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (25.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-7400T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-6300HQ vs Core i5-7400T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-6300HQ

The Core i5-6300HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,672 points. Launch price was $250.

Core i5-7400T

The Core i5-7400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,692 points. Launch price was $187.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-6300HQ and Core i5-7400T share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-6300HQ versus 3 GHz on the Core i5-7400T — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-6300HQ (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-6300HQ uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-7400T uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6300HQ scores 4,672 against the Core i5-7400T's 4,692 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-7400T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,000 vs 1,069, a 6.7% lead for the Core i5-7400T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i5-6300HQ vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7400T.

Feature	Core i5-6300HQ	Core i5-7400T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+7%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	2.4 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	6 MB	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	4,672	4,692
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	3,334
Geekbench 6 Single	1,000	1,069+7%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	2,463

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-6300HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-7400T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-6300HQ versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i5-7400T — the Core i5-7400T supports 12.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM170,QM170 (Core i5-6300HQ) and B150,Q170,B250,Q250,H110,Q270,H170,Z170,H270,Z270 (Core i5-7400T).

Feature	Core i5-6300HQ	Core i5-7400T
Socket	BGA1440	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	DDR4-2400+13%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-6300HQ) vs Yes (Core i5-7400T). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 530 (Core i5-6300HQ) and Intel HD Graphics 630 (Core i5-7400T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6300HQ targets Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-6300HQ rivals A12-9730P.