Core i5-6300HQ vs Xeon X5667
Core i5-6300HQ
Xeon X5667
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-6300HQ is positioned at rank 212 and the Xeon X5667 is on rank 579, so the Core i5-6300HQ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-6300HQ
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5667
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-6300HQ | Xeon X5667 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-6300HQ | Xeon X5667 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-6300HQ and Xeon X5667
Core i5-6300HQ
The Core i5-6300HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,672 points. Launch price was $250.
Xeon X5667
The Xeon X5667 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,697 points. Launch price was $80.
Processing Power
The Core i5-6300HQ packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon X5667's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-6300HQ versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon X5667 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Xeon X5667 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The Core i5-6300HQ uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon X5667 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6300HQ scores 4,672 against the Xeon X5667's 4,697 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon X5667. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i5-6300HQ vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5667.
| Feature | Core i5-6300HQ | Xeon X5667 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.46 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.06 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB | 12 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 4,672 | 4,697 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-6300HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5667 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-6300HQ versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5667 — the Core i5-6300HQ supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-6300HQ) vs 3 (Xeon X5667). Chipset compatibility: HM170,QM170 (Core i5-6300HQ) and Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5667).
| Feature | Core i5-6300HQ | Xeon X5667 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133+33% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 3+50% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. The Core i5-6300HQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Xeon X5667 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6300HQ targets Gaming Laptop, Xeon X5667 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-6300HQ rivals A12-9730P; Xeon X5667 rivals Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Core i5-6300HQ | Xeon X5667 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 530 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Gaming Laptop | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-6300HQ and Xeon X5667
