Core i5-6300U vs Core i7-4600M

Intel

Core i5-6300U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-4600M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-6300U vs Core i7-4600M Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-6300U vs Core i7-4600M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-6300U vs Core i7-4600M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-6300U

2015

Why buy it

  • +0.1% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4600M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).

Core i7-4600M

2013

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
  • 33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (3,204 vs 3,207).
  • 3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-6300U better than Core i7-4600M?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-4600M is ahead with a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6300U pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Core i7-4600M also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6300U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-6300U still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-6300U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-6300U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-6300U vs Core i7-4600M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-6300U

The Core i5-6300U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,207 points. Launch price was $281.

Intel

Core i7-4600M

The Core i7-4600M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,204 points. Launch price was $346.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-6300U and Core i7-4600M share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i5-6300U versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-4600M — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-4600M (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i5-6300U uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4600M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6300U scores 3,207 against the Core i7-4600M's 3,204 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-6300U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 967 vs 1,025, a 5.8% lead for the Core i7-4600M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-6300U vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-4600M.

FeatureCore i5-6300UCore i7-4600M
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3 GHz
3.6 GHz+20%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
2.9 GHz+21%
L3 Cache
3 MB
4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
3,207
3,204
Cinebench R23 Multi
656
Geekbench 6 Single
967
1,025+6%
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,132
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-6300U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4600M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-6300U versus DDR3L 1600 MHz on the Core i7-4600M — the Core i5-6300U supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i5-6300U) vs 16 (Core i7-4600M) — the Core i7-4600M offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Skylake-U (Core i5-6300U) and Intel HM86,Intel HM87,Intel QM87 (Core i7-4600M).

FeatureCore i5-6300UCore i7-4600M
Socket
BGA1356
PGA946
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133+33%
DDR3L 1600 MHz
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
12
16+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-6300U) vs true (Core i7-4600M). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 520 (Core i5-6300U) and Intel HD Graphics 4600 (Core i7-4600M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6300U targets Mainstream Laptop, Core i7-4600M targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-6300U rivals PRO A12-9800B.

FeatureCore i5-6300UCore i7-4600M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 520
Intel HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
true
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop
Mobile