Core i5-6300U vs FX-7500

Core i5-6300U vs FX-7500 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-6300U

2 / 4

3,207

0.0%

3,209

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-6300U vs FX-7500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-6300U vs FX-7500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-6300U

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 19W, a 4W reduction.
✅50% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-7500 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,207 vs 3,209).

FX-7500

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Core i5-6300U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌26.7% higher power demand at 19W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-7500 better than Core i5-6300U?

Yes. FX-7500 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-7500 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-7500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-7500 is the better buy right now. FX-7500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $100 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (32.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-6300U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-6300U vs FX-7500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-6300U

The Core i5-6300U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,207 points. Launch price was $281.

FX-7500

The FX-7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 19 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,209 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-6300U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-7500 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-7500 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i5-6300U versus 3.3 GHz on the FX-7500 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the FX-7500 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-6300U uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-7500 uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6300U scores 3,207 against the FX-7500's 3,209 — a 0.1% lead for the FX-7500.

Feature	Core i5-6300U	FX-7500
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.3 GHz+10%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+14%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	4096 kB+700%
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Kaveri (2014−2015)
PassMark	3,207	3,209
Geekbench 6 Single	967	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-6300U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-7500 uses FP3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-6300U versus DDR3-1600 on the FX-7500 — the Core i5-6300U supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-6300U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i5-6300U) vs 8 (FX-7500) — the Core i5-6300U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i5-6300U	FX-7500
Socket	BGA1356	FP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+33%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	12+50%	8

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-6300U) vs AMD-V (FX-7500). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 520 (Core i5-6300U) and Radeon R7 (FX-7500) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6300U targets Mainstream Laptop, FX-7500 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-6300U rivals PRO A12-9800B.