
Core i5-6440EQ

Opteron 6328
Core i5-6440EQ vs Opteron 6328 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-6440EQ vs Opteron 6328 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-6440EQ vs Opteron 6328: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-6440EQ
2015Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $325 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 131.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.3 vs 9.2 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 115W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6328 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6328, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads.
Opteron 6328
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,306 vs 5,329).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 21.3 PassMark/$ ($575 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌155.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-6440EQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-6440EQ better than Opteron 6328?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-6440EQ vs Opteron 6328 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-6440EQ
The Core i5-6440EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,329 points. Launch price was $250.

Opteron 6328
The Opteron 6328 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,306 points. Launch price was $575.
Processing Power
The Core i5-6440EQ packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 6328 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 6328 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i5-6440EQ versus 3.8 GHz on the Opteron 6328 — a 33.8% clock advantage for the Opteron 6328. The Core i5-6440EQ uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 6328 uses Abu Dhabi (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6440EQ scores 5,329 against the Opteron 6328's 5,306 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-6440EQ. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i5-6440EQ vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6328.
| Feature | Core i5-6440EQ | Opteron 6328 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.8 GHz+41% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB (per module)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Abu Dhabi (2012) |
| PassMark | 5,329 | 5,306 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 900 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,136 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-6440EQ) / not specified (Opteron 6328). The Core i5-6440EQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Opteron 6328 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6440EQ targets Workstation.
| Feature | Core i5-6440EQ | Opteron 6328 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 530 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-6440EQ was priced at $250, while the Opteron 6328 came in at $575. On launch pricing ($250 vs $575), Core i5-6440EQ was $325 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-6440EQ delivers 21.3 pts/$ vs 9.2 pts/$ for the Opteron 6328 — making the Core i5-6440EQ the 79.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-6440EQ | Opteron 6328 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-57% | $575 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.3+132% | 9.2 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















