
Core i5-6500T

Opteron 6220
Core i5-6500T vs Opteron 6220 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-6500T vs Opteron 6220 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-6500T vs Opteron 6220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-6500T
2015Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $406 less on MSRP ($117 MSRP vs $523 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 348.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.7 vs 9.1 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $523 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 115W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6220 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6220, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads.
Opteron 6220
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,753 vs 4,764).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 40.7 PassMark/$ ($523 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
- ❌228.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-6500T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-6500T better than Opteron 6220?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-6500T vs Opteron 6220 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-6500T
The Core i5-6500T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 July 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,764 points. Launch price was $192.

Opteron 6220
The Opteron 6220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,753 points. Launch price was $523.
Processing Power
The Core i5-6500T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 6220 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 6220 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-6500T versus 3.6 GHz on the Opteron 6220 — a 14.9% clock advantage for the Opteron 6220 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-6500T uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 6220 uses Interlagos (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6500T scores 4,764 against the Opteron 6220's 4,753 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-6500T. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-6500T vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6220.
| Feature | Core i5-6500T | Opteron 6220 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.6 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per module)+700% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Interlagos (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 4,764 | 4,753 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-6500T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6220 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-6500T | Opteron 6220 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | G34 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-6500T) / not specified (Opteron 6220). The Core i5-6500T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Opteron 6220 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6500T targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-6500T | Opteron 6220 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 530 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-6500T was priced at $117, while the Opteron 6220 came in at $523. On launch pricing ($117 vs $523), Core i5-6500T was $406 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-6500T delivers 40.7 pts/$ vs 9.1 pts/$ for the Opteron 6220 — making the Core i5-6500T the 127% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-6500T | Opteron 6220 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $117-78% | $523 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.7+347% | 9.1 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















