
Core i5-6500T

Processor N95
Core i5-6500T vs Processor N95 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-6500T vs Processor N95 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-6500T vs Processor N95: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-6500T
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $43 less on MSRP ($117 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 36.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.7 vs 29.9 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while Processor N95 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,764 vs 4,783).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Processor N95 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
Processor N95
2023Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.9 vs 40.7 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-6500T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Processor N95 better than Core i5-6500T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-6500T vs Processor N95 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-6500T
The Core i5-6500T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 July 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,764 points. Launch price was $192.

Processor N95
The Processor N95 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 4,783 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-6500T and Processor N95 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-6500T versus 3.4 GHz on the Processor N95 — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Processor N95 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 0.1 GHz). The Core i5-6500T uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Processor N95 uses Alder Lake-N (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6500T scores 4,764 against the Processor N95's 4,783 — a 0.4% lead for the Processor N95. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-6500T | Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.4 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+2400% | 0.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 2 MB (total)+700% |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
| PassMark | 4,764 | 4,783 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-6500T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Processor N95 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-6500T | Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FCBGA1264 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-6500T) / not specified (Processor N95). The Core i5-6500T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Processor N95 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6500T targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-6500T | Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 530 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-6500T was priced at $117, while the Processor N95 came in at $160. On launch pricing ($117 vs $160), Core i5-6500T was $43 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-6500T delivers 40.7 pts/$ vs 29.9 pts/$ for the Processor N95 — making the Core i5-6500T the 30.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-6500T | Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $117-27% | $160 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.7+36% | 29.9 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














