
Core i5-6500T
Popular choices:

Xeon E3-1220 v2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-6500T
2015Why buy it
- ✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 69W, a 34W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while Xeon E3-1220 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $117 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1220 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E3-1220 v2
2012Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,680 vs 4,764).
- ❌97.1% higher power demand at 69W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-6500T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-6500T
2015Xeon E3-1220 v2
2012Why buy it
- ✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 69W, a 34W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while Xeon E3-1220 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $117 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1220 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,680 vs 4,764).
- ❌97.1% higher power demand at 69W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-6500T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-6500T better than Xeon E3-1220 v2?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-6500T | Xeon E3-1220 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-6500T | Xeon E3-1220 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-6500T | Xeon E3-1220 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-6500T | Xeon E3-1220 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-6500T and Xeon E3-1220 v2

Core i5-6500T
Core i5-6500T
The Core i5-6500T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 July 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,764 points. Launch price was $192.

Xeon E3-1220 v2
Xeon E3-1220 v2
The Xeon E3-1220 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 69 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,680 points. Launch price was $220.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-6500T and Xeon E3-1220 v2 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-6500T versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E3-1220 v2 — a 12.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1220 v2 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-6500T uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1220 v2 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6500T scores 4,764 against the Xeon E3-1220 v2's 4,680 — a 1.8% lead for the Core i5-6500T. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-6500T vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1220 v2.
| Feature | Core i5-6500T | Xeon E3-1220 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.1 GHz+24% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 4,764+2% | 4,680 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-6500T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1220 v2 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-6500T | Xeon E3-1220 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-6500T) / not specified (Xeon E3-1220 v2). The Core i5-6500T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Xeon E3-1220 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6500T targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-6500T | Xeon E3-1220 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 530 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












