Core i5-661 vs Core m7-6Y75

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-661 vs Core m7-6Y75 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-661 vs Core m7-6Y75: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-661

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $197 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
✅Delivers 102.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.2 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
✅Draws 87W instead of 512W, a 425W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core m7-6Y75

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,363 vs 2,387).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 12.2 PassMark/$ ($393 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌488.5% higher power demand at 512W vs 87W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-661 better than Core m7-6Y75?

Yes. Core i5-661 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-661 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-661 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-661 is the better buy right now. Core i5-661 comes in $197 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $393 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 102.5% better value on MSRP (12.2 vs 6.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core m7-6Y75 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-661 vs Core m7-6Y75 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-661

The Core i5-661 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 87 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,387 points. Launch price was $252.

Core m7-6Y75

The Core m7-6Y75 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,363 points. Launch price was $393.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-661 and Core m7-6Y75 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-661 versus 3.1 GHz on the Core m7-6Y75 — a 14.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-661 (base: 3.33 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Core i5-661 uses the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core m7-6Y75 uses Skylake-Y (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-661 scores 2,387 against the Core m7-6Y75's 2,363 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-661. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i5-661	Core m7-6Y75
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+16%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.33 GHz+178%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Clarkdale (2010−2011)	Skylake-Y (2015)
PassMark	2,387+1%	2,363

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-661 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core m7-6Y75 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-661	Core m7-6Y75
Socket	LGA1156	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-661 was priced at $196, while the Core m7-6Y75 came in at $393. On launch pricing ($196 vs $393), Core i5-661 was $197 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-661 delivers 12.2 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Core m7-6Y75 — making the Core i5-661 the 67.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-661	Core m7-6Y75
MSRP	$196-50%	$393
Performance per Dollar	12.2+103%	6.0
Release Date	2010	2015

Search Core i5-661 on Amazon

Search Core m7-6Y75 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.