
Athlon II X4 645

Core i5-661
Athlon II X4 645 vs Core i5-661 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X4 645 vs Core i5-661 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X4 645 vs Core i5-661: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X4 645
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($126 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 54.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.8 vs 12.2 PassMark/$ ($126 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-661.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,375 vs 2,387).
Core i5-661
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 87W instead of 95W, a 8W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.2 vs 18.8 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $126 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 645.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-661 better than Athlon II X4 645?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X4 645 vs Core i5-661 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X4 645
The Athlon II X4 645 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,375 points. Launch price was $80.

Core i5-661
The Core i5-661 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 87 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,387 points. Launch price was $252.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X4 645 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-661 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 645 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Athlon II X4 645 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-661 — a 14.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-661 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The Athlon II X4 645 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-661 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 645 scores 2,375 against the Core i5-661's 2,387 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-661. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 645 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-661.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 645 | Core i5-661 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.6 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.33 GHz+7% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Propus (2009−2011) | Clarkdale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,375 | 2,387 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,374 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 399 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,374 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 645 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-661 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 645 | Core i5-661 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA1156 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Athlon II X4 645) / not specified (Core i5-661). Primary use case: Athlon II X4 645 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 645 | Core i5-661 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X4 645 was priced at $126, while the Core i5-661 came in at $196. On launch pricing ($126 vs $196), Athlon II X4 645 was $70 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 645 delivers 18.8 pts/$ vs 12.2 pts/$ for the Core i5-661 — making the Athlon II X4 645 the 43% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 645 | Core i5-661 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $126-36% | $196 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.8+54% | 12.2 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















