Athlon II X4 645 vs Core 2 Duo T6670
Athlon II X4 645
Core 2 Duo T6670
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X4 645 is positioned at rank 819 and the Core 2 Duo T6670 is on rank 474, so the Core 2 Duo T6670 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 645
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T6670
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon II X4 645 | Core 2 Duo T6670 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Propus (2009−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon II X4 645 | Core 2 Duo T6670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X4 645 and Core 2 Duo T6670
Athlon II X4 645
The Athlon II X4 645 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,375 points. Launch price was $80.
Core 2 Duo T6670
The Core 2 Duo T6670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,365 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X4 645 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T6670 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X4 645 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Athlon II X4 645 versus 2.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T6670 — a 34% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 645 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Athlon II X4 645 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T6670 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 645 scores 2,375 against the Core 2 Duo T6670's 2,365 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon II X4 645. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 399 vs 252, a 45.2% lead for the Athlon II X4 645 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,374 vs 252 (138% advantage for the Athlon II X4 645). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 645 vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T6670.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 645 | Core 2 Duo T6670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz+41% | 2.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+41% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB+300% |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Propus (2009−2011) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,375 | 2,365 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,374 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 399+58% | 252 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,374+445% | 252 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 645 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T6670 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Athlon II X4 645 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon II X4 645) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo T6670) — the Athlon II X4 645 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 700 Series,AMD 800 Series,AMD 900 Series (Athlon II X4 645) and GM45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo T6670).
| Feature | Athlon II X4 645 | Core 2 Duo T6670 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: Yes (Athlon II X4 645) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T6670). Primary use case: Athlon II X4 645 targets Desktop, Core 2 Duo T6670 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T6670 rivals Core 2 Duo T6600.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 645 | Core 2 Duo T6670 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x |
| Target Use | Desktop | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II X4 645 and Core 2 Duo T6670
