
Athlon II X4 645 vs Pentium P6200

Athlon II X4 645

Pentium P6200
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X4 645 is positioned at rank 819 and the Pentium P6200 is on rank 557, so the Pentium P6200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 645
Performance Per Dollar Pentium P6200
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon II X4 645 | Pentium P6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($25) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Propus (2009−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon II X4 645 | Pentium P6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+24%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($25) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X4 645 and Pentium P6200

Athlon II X4 645
The Athlon II X4 645 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,375 points. Launch price was $80.

Pentium P6200
The Pentium P6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,394 points. Launch price was $60.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X4 645 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium P6200 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X4 645 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Athlon II X4 645 versus 0.13 GHz on the Pentium P6200 — a 183.9% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 645 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Athlon II X4 645 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium P6200 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 645 scores 2,375 against the Pentium P6200's 2,394 — a 0.8% lead for the Pentium P6200. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 399 vs 200, a 66.4% lead for the Athlon II X4 645 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,374 vs 400 (109.8% advantage for the Athlon II X4 645). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 645 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6200.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 645 | Pentium P6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz+2285% | 0.13 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+46% | 2.13 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Propus (2009−2011) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,375 | 2,394 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,374 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 399+100% | 200 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,374+244% | 400 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 645 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium P6200 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Athlon II X4 645 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD 700 Series,AMD 800 Series,AMD 900 Series (Athlon II X4 645) and HM55,HM57 (Pentium P6200).
| Feature | Athlon II X4 645 | Pentium P6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: Yes (Athlon II X4 645) vs None (Pentium P6200). The Pentium P6200 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Athlon II X4 645 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X4 645 targets Desktop, Pentium P6200 targets Legacy Laptop.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 645 | Pentium P6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | None |
| Target Use | Desktop | Legacy Laptop |
Value Analysis
The Athlon II X4 645 launched at $126 MSRP, while the Pentium P6200 debuted at $60. At current prices ($20 vs $25), the Athlon II X4 645 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 645 delivers 118.8 pts/$ vs 95.8 pts/$ for the Pentium P6200 — making the Athlon II X4 645 the 21.4% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 645 | Pentium P6200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $126 | $60-52% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-20% | $25 |
| Performance per Dollar | 118.8+24% | 95.8 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















