3020e
VS
Athlon II X4 645

3020e vs Athlon II X4 645

AMD

3020e

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2020
VS
AMD

Athlon II X4 645

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The 3020e is positioned at rank 805 and the Athlon II X4 645 is on rank 819, so the 3020e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar 3020e

#793
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1219%
#794
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1202%
#795
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1103%
#796
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1098%
#797
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1088%
#799
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1051%
#800
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1007%
#801
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1006%
#802
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
979%
#805
3020e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
100%
#809
Athlon II M320
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
99%
#810
Celeron B800
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
99%
#811
Celeron B710
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
99%
#812
Athlon II Neo K345
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#818
Core i7-8709G
MSRP: $338|Avg: $150
98%
#819
Celeron M 560
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 645

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16537%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15625%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11345%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3418%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2707%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2368%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1356%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1339%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1219%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1219%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1205%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1173%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1156%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1152%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1141%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
96%
#819
Athlon II X4 645
MSRP: $126|Avg: $20
100%
#820
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
99%
#821
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
99%
#822
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
99%
#823
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
99%
#824
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
98%
#825
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
98%
#827
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
98%
#828
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
98%
#829
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
97%
#830
Pentium E5400
MSRP: $55|Avg: $49
97%
#831
Core i5-4570R
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
97%
#832
A6-3650
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
97%
#833
Core i7-4770R
MSRP: $360|Avg: $89
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The 3020e (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
Insight3020eAthlon II X4 645
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($20)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Dali (Zen) (2020) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Propus (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon II X4 645 (2010) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
Insight3020eAthlon II X4 645
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+23%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of 3020e and Athlon II X4 645

AMD

3020e

The 3020e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,406 points. Launch price was $50.

AMD

Athlon II X4 645

The Athlon II X4 645 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,375 points. Launch price was $80.

Processing Power

The 3020e packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon II X4 645 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 645 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the 3020e versus 3.1 GHz on the Athlon II X4 645 — a 17.5% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 645 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The 3020e uses the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Athlon II X4 645 uses Propus (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the 3020e scores 2,406 against the Athlon II X4 645's 2,375 — a 1.3% lead for the 3020e. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 480 vs 1,374 (96.4% advantage for the Athlon II X4 645). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 660 vs 399, a 49.3% lead for the 3020e that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,100 vs 1,374 (22.2% advantage for the Athlon II X4 645). L3 cache: 4 MB on the 3020e vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 645.

Feature3020eAthlon II X4 645
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz
3.1 GHz+19%
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
3.1 GHz+158%
L3 Cache
4 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Dali (Zen) (2020)
Propus (2009−2011)
PassMark
2,406+1%
2,375
Cinebench R23 Multi
480
1,374+186%
Geekbench 6 Single
660+65%
399
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,100
1,374+25%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The 3020e uses the FT5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X4 645 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the 3020e versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 645 — the 3020e supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The 3020e supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (3020e) vs 16 (Athlon II X4 645) — the Athlon II X4 645 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature3020eAthlon II X4 645
Socket
FT5
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400+33%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+100%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (3020e) vs Yes (Athlon II X4 645). The 3020e includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (Vega 3)), while the Athlon II X4 645 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: 3020e targets Entry Level Laptop, Athlon II X4 645 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: 3020e rivals Celeron N4020.

Feature3020eAthlon II X4 645
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics (Vega 3)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Yes
Target Use
Entry Level Laptop
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The 3020e launched at $100 MSRP, while the Athlon II X4 645 debuted at $126. At current prices ($25 vs $20), the Athlon II X4 645 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the 3020e delivers 96.2 pts/$ vs 118.8 pts/$ for the Athlon II X4 645 — making the Athlon II X4 645 the 20.9% better value option.

Feature3020eAthlon II X4 645
MSRP
$100-21%
$126
Avg Price (30d)
$25
$20-20%
Performance per Dollar
96.2
118.8+23%
Release Date
2020
2010