3020e vs Core i5-4350U

3020e vs Core i5-4350U Performance Spectrum

3020e

2 / 2

2,406

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-4350U

2 / 4

2,425

+0.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

3020e vs Core i5-4350U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

3020e vs Core i5-4350U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

3020e

2020

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (Vega 3), while Core i5-4350U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-4350U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,406 vs 2,425).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Core i5-4350U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i5-4350U

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.
❌No integrated graphics, while 3020e can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4350U better than 3020e?

Yes. Core i5-4350U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-4350U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4350U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4350U is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i5-4350U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. 3020e only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 4.1% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

3020e makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2013) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

3020e vs Core i5-4350U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

3020e

The 3020e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,406 points. Launch price was $50.

Core i5-4350U

The Core i5-4350U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,425 points. Launch price was $342.

⚡

Processing Power

The 3020e packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-4350U's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the 3020e versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-4350U — a 10.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-4350U (base: 1.2 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The 3020e uses the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-4350U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the 3020e scores 2,406 against the Core i5-4350U's 2,425 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-4350U. L3 cache: 4 MB on the 3020e vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-4350U.

Feature	3020e	Core i5-4350U
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz	2.9 GHz+12%
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	1.4 GHz+17%
L3 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Dali (Zen) (2020)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,406	2,425
Cinebench R23 Multi	480	—
Geekbench 6 Single	660	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,100	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The 3020e uses the FT5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4350U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	3020e	Core i5-4350U
Socket	FT5	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (3020e) / not specified (Core i5-4350U). The 3020e includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (Vega 3)), while the Core i5-4350U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: 3020e targets Entry Level Laptop. Direct competitor: 3020e rivals Celeron N4020.