3020e vs Core m3-7Y30

AMD

3020e

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core m3-7Y30

2 Cores4 Thrd4.5 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2016
Similar parts
·······

3020e vs Core m3-7Y30 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

3020e vs Core m3-7Y30 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

3020e vs Core m3-7Y30: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

3020e

2020

Why buy it

  • Costs $181 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
  • Delivers 179.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.1 vs 8.6 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
  • Draws 1W instead of 5W, a 4W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (660 vs 768).
  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (480 vs 645).

Core m3-7Y30

2016

Why buy it

  • +16.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 24.1 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 350% higher power demand at 4.5W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core m3-7Y30 better than 3020e?
Yes. Core m3-7Y30 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 34.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 0.5% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core m3-7Y30 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core m3-7Y30 is the stronger fit. You are getting 34.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core m3-7Y30 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core m3-7Y30 comes in 181.0% more expensive on MSRP at $281 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. 3020e only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
3020e makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

3020e vs Core m3-7Y30 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

3020e

The 3020e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,406 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Core m3-7Y30

The Core m3-7Y30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,418 points. Launch price was $281.

Processing Power

The 3020e packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core m3-7Y30's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the 3020e versus 2.6 GHz on the Core m3-7Y30 — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.2 GHz vs 1 GHz). The 3020e uses the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core m3-7Y30 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the 3020e scores 2,406 against the Core m3-7Y30's 2,418 — a 0.5% lead for the Core m3-7Y30. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 480 vs 645 (29.3% advantage for the Core m3-7Y30). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 660 vs 768, a 15.1% lead for the Core m3-7Y30 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,100 vs 1,481 (29.5% advantage for the Core m3-7Y30). Both processors carry 4 MB of L3 cache.

Feature3020eCore m3-7Y30
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Base Clock
1.2 GHz+20%
1 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512 kB
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Dali (Zen) (2020)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
2,406
2,418
Cinebench R23 Multi
480
645+34%
Geekbench 6 Single
660
768+16%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,100
1,481+35%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The 3020e uses the FT5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core m3-7Y30 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the 3020e versus LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600 on the Core m3-7Y30 — the 3020e supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The 3020e supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (3020e) vs 10 (Core m3-7Y30) — the Core m3-7Y30 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature3020eCore m3-7Y30
Socket
FT5
FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400+29%
LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+100%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
8
10+25%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (3020e) vs VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core m3-7Y30). Both include integrated graphics Radeon Graphics (Vega 3) (3020e) and Intel HD Graphics 615 (Core m3-7Y30) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: 3020e targets Entry Level Laptop, Core m3-7Y30 targets Ultra-portable. Direct competitor: 3020e rivals Celeron N4020.

Feature3020eCore m3-7Y30
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics (Vega 3)
Intel HD Graphics 615
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x / VT-d / EPT
Target Use
Entry Level Laptop
Ultra-portable
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the 3020e was priced at $100, while the Core m3-7Y30 came in at $281. On launch pricing ($100 vs $281), 3020e was $181 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the 3020e delivers 24.1 pts/$ vs 8.6 pts/$ for the Core m3-7Y30 — making the 3020e the 94.6% better value option.

Feature3020eCore m3-7Y30
MSRP
$100-64%
$281
Performance per Dollar
24.1+180%
8.6
Release Date
2020
2016

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.