
3020e

Core m3-7Y30
3020e vs Core m3-7Y30 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
3020e vs Core m3-7Y30 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
3020e vs Core m3-7Y30: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
3020e
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $181 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 179.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.1 vs 8.6 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 5W, a 4W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (660 vs 768).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (480 vs 645).
Core m3-7Y30
2016Why buy it
- ✅+16.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 24.1 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌350% higher power demand at 4.5W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core m3-7Y30 better than 3020e?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
3020e vs Core m3-7Y30 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

3020e
The 3020e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,406 points. Launch price was $50.

Core m3-7Y30
The Core m3-7Y30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,418 points. Launch price was $281.
Processing Power
The 3020e packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core m3-7Y30's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the 3020e versus 2.6 GHz on the Core m3-7Y30 — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.2 GHz vs 1 GHz). The 3020e uses the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core m3-7Y30 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the 3020e scores 2,406 against the Core m3-7Y30's 2,418 — a 0.5% lead for the Core m3-7Y30. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 480 vs 645 (29.3% advantage for the Core m3-7Y30). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 660 vs 768, a 15.1% lead for the Core m3-7Y30 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,100 vs 1,481 (29.5% advantage for the Core m3-7Y30). Both processors carry 4 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | 3020e | Core m3-7Y30 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz+20% | 1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Dali (Zen) (2020) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 2,406 | 2,418 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 480 | 645+34% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 660 | 768+16% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,100 | 1,481+35% |
Memory & Platform
The 3020e uses the FT5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core m3-7Y30 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the 3020e versus LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600 on the Core m3-7Y30 — the 3020e supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The 3020e supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (3020e) vs 10 (Core m3-7Y30) — the Core m3-7Y30 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | 3020e | Core m3-7Y30 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT5 | FCBGA1515 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+29% | LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+100% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 10+25% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (3020e) vs VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core m3-7Y30). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Graphics (Vega 3) (3020e) and Intel HD Graphics 615 (Core m3-7Y30) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: 3020e targets Entry Level Laptop, Core m3-7Y30 targets Ultra-portable. Direct competitor: 3020e rivals Celeron N4020.
| Feature | 3020e | Core m3-7Y30 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics (Vega 3) | Intel HD Graphics 615 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x / VT-d / EPT |
| Target Use | Entry Level Laptop | Ultra-portable |
Value Analysis
At launch, the 3020e was priced at $100, while the Core m3-7Y30 came in at $281. On launch pricing ($100 vs $281), 3020e was $181 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the 3020e delivers 24.1 pts/$ vs 8.6 pts/$ for the Core m3-7Y30 — making the 3020e the 94.6% better value option.
| Feature | 3020e | Core m3-7Y30 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-64% | $281 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.1+180% | 8.6 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















