3020e
VS
Core i3-3245

3020e vs Core i3-3245

AMD

3020e

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2020
VS
Intel

Core i3-3245

2 Cores4 Thrd55 WW2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The 3020e is positioned at rank 805 and the Core i3-3245 is on rank 794, so the Core i3-3245 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar 3020e

#793
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1219%
#794
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1202%
#795
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1103%
#796
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1098%
#797
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1088%
#799
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1051%
#800
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1007%
#801
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1006%
#802
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
979%
#805
3020e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
100%
#809
Athlon II M320
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
99%
#810
Celeron B800
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
99%
#811
Celeron B710
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
99%
#812
Athlon II Neo K345
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#818
Core i7-8709G
MSRP: $338|Avg: $150
98%
#819
Celeron M 560
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3245

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
15508%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14654%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10640%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3205%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2539%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2221%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1272%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1256%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1143%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1143%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1130%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1100%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1084%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1080%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1070%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
98%
#394
Ryzen 3 2200GE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#794
Core i3-3245
MSRP: $120|Avg: $50
100%
#796
FX-4170
MSRP: $157|Avg: $23
99%
#798
Athlon II X3 415e
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
98%
#799
Core i5-2300
MSRP: $177|Avg: $17
98%
#800
Core i7-4820K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $40
98%
#802
Core i7-3770K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $75
97%
#803
Core i5-4460T
MSRP: $187|Avg: $30
97%
#804
Core i3-3220
MSRP: $117|Avg: $88
97%
#805
Core i7-3770T
MSRP: $278|Avg: $105
97%
#807
Pentium G645T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
96%
#808
Pentium G620
MSRP: $64|Avg: $12
96%
#809
Core i5-7442EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The 3020e (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
Insight3020eCore i3-3245
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($25)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Dali (Zen) (2020) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-3245 (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
Insight3020eCore i3-3245
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+100%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($25)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of 3020e and Core i3-3245

AMD

3020e

The 3020e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,406 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Core i3-3245

The Core i3-3245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2013 (12 years ago). It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,412 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The 3020e packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-3245's 2 cores. The 3020e is built on the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture. In PassMark, the 3020e scores 2,406 against the Core i3-3245's 2,412 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-3245. L3 cache: 4 MB on the 3020e vs 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i3-3245.

Feature3020eCore i3-3245
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
3.4 GHz+183%
L3 Cache
4 MB+33%
3 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache
1 MB
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Dali (Zen) (2020)
PassMark
2,406
2,412
Cinebench R23 Multi
480
Geekbench 6 Single
660
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,100
🧠

Memory & Platform

The 3020e uses the FT5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-3245 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the 3020e versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-3245 — the 3020e supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (3020e) vs 16 (Core i3-3245) — the Core i3-3245 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature3020eCore i3-3245
Socket
FT5
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400+33%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (3020e) vs VT-x (Core i3-3245). Both include integrated graphics Radeon Graphics (Vega 3) (3020e) and HD Graphics 4000 (Core i3-3245) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: 3020e targets Entry Level Laptop, Core i3-3245 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: 3020e rivals Celeron N4020.

Feature3020eCore i3-3245
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics (Vega 3)
HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x
Target Use
Entry Level Laptop
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The 3020e launched at $100 MSRP, while the Core i3-3245 debuted at $120. At current prices ($25 vs $50), the 3020e is $25 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the 3020e delivers 96.2 pts/$ vs 48.2 pts/$ for the Core i3-3245 — making the 3020e the 66.4% better value option.

Feature3020eCore i3-3245
MSRP
$100-17%
$120
Avg Price (30d)
$25-50%
$50
Performance per Dollar
96.2+100%
48.2
Release Date
2020
2013