3020e
Core i7-3517UE
3020e vs Core i7-3517UE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
3020e vs Core i7-3517UE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
3020e vs Core i7-3517UE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
3020e
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $330 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 233.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.1 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $330 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 17W, a 16W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i7-3517UE
2012Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,384 vs 2,406).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 24.1 PassMark/$ ($330 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌1600% higher power demand at 17W vs 1W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while 3020e can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is 3020e better than Core i7-3517UE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
3020e vs Core i7-3517UE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
3020e
The 3020e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,406 points. Launch price was $50.
Core i7-3517UE
The Core i7-3517UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,384 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The 3020e packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-3517UE's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the 3020e versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-3517UE — a 7.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-3517UE (base: 1.2 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The 3020e uses the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-3517UE uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the 3020e scores 2,406 against the Core i7-3517UE's 2,384 — a 0.9% lead for the 3020e. L3 cache: 4 MB on the 3020e vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3517UE.
| Feature | 3020e | Core i7-3517UE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 1.7 GHz+42% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Dali (Zen) (2020) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,406 | 2,384 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 480 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 660 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,100 | — |
Memory & Platform
The 3020e uses the FT5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3517UE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | 3020e | Core i7-3517UE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT5 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (3020e) / not specified (Core i7-3517UE). The 3020e includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (Vega 3)), while the Core i7-3517UE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: 3020e targets Entry Level Laptop. Direct competitor: 3020e rivals Celeron N4020.
| Feature | 3020e | Core i7-3517UE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics (Vega 3) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Entry Level Laptop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the 3020e was priced at $100, while the Core i7-3517UE came in at $330. On launch pricing ($100 vs $330), 3020e was $230 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the 3020e delivers 24.1 pts/$ vs 7.2 pts/$ for the Core i7-3517UE — making the 3020e the 107.6% better value option.
| Feature | 3020e | Core i7-3517UE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-70% | $330 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.1+235% | 7.2 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on 3020e and Core i7-3517UE
