Core i5-7267U vs Xeon W3580

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-7267U vs Xeon W3580 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-7267U vs Xeon W3580: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-7267U

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 130W, a 102W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650, while Xeon W3580 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W3580 across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,622 vs 3,638).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W3580, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon W3580

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.3% higher average FPS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while Core i5-7267U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌364.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7267U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W3580 better than Core i5-7267U?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W3580 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-7267U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W3580 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.3% more average FPS across 9 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W3580 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W3580 is the better buy right now. Xeon W3580 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $294 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.3% average FPS lead across 9 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-7267U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-7267U vs Xeon W3580 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-7267U

The Core i5-7267U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,622 points. Launch price was $304.

Xeon W3580

The Xeon W3580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,638 points. Launch price was $215.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-7267U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon W3580 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon W3580 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-7267U versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon W3580 — a 2.8% clock advantage for the Xeon W3580 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The Core i5-7267U uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W3580 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7267U scores 3,622 against the Xeon W3580's 3,638 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon W3580. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i5-7267U vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W3580.

Feature	Core i5-7267U	Xeon W3580
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	3.6 GHz+3%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz	3.33 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	4 MB	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark	3,622	3,638

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-7267U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3580 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-7267U	Xeon W3580
Socket	BGA1356	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	32	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i5-7267U) / not specified (Xeon W3580). The Core i5-7267U includes integrated graphics (Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650), while the Xeon W3580 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7267U targets Mobile.