Core i3-4360 vs Core i5-7267U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4360 vs Core i5-7267U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4360 vs Core i5-7267U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4360

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-7267U.

Trade-offs

❌92.9% higher power demand at 54W vs 28W.

Core i5-7267U

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 54W, a 26W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4360 across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,622 vs 3,639).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4360.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4360 better than Core i5-7267U?

Yes. Core i3-4360 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.7% average FPS lead across 31 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4360 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.7% more average FPS across 31 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4360 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4360 still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-4360 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.7% average FPS lead across 31 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-7267U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-4360 vs Core i5-7267U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4360

The Core i3-4360 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,639 points. Launch price was $352.

Core i5-7267U

The Core i5-7267U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,622 points. Launch price was $304.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-4360 and Core i5-7267U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i3-4360 versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-7267U — a 5.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-4360 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i3-4360 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-7267U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4360 scores 3,639 against the Core i5-7267U's 3,622 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-4360. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4360 vs 4 MB on the Core i5-7267U.

Feature	Core i3-4360	Core i5-7267U
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+6%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+19%	3.1 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	3,639	3,622
Geekbench 6 Single	1,128	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4360 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-7267U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4360 versus 2133 on the Core i5-7267U — the Core i5-7267U supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-4360) vs 12 (Core i5-7267U) — the Core i3-4360 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4360) and Kaby Lake-U (Core i5-7267U).

Feature	Core i3-4360	Core i5-7267U
Socket	LGA1150	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4360) vs true (Core i5-7267U). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4360) and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 (Core i5-7267U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4360 targets Mainstream Desktop, Core i5-7267U targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i3-4360 rivals Core i3-6100.

Feature	Core i3-4360	Core i5-7267U
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4600	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, EPT	true
Target Use	Mainstream Desktop	Mobile