Core i3-4360 vs Xeon W3580

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4360 vs Xeon W3580 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4360 vs Xeon W3580: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4360

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 54W instead of 130W, a 76W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Xeon W3580 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W3580.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W3580, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon W3580

2009

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,638 vs 3,639).
❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while Core i3-4360 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌140.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 54W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4360 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4360.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4360 better than Xeon W3580?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W3580 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-4360 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4360 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.6% more average FPS across 8 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4360 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4360 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W3580 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i3-4360 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 8 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W3580 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4360 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4360 vs Xeon W3580 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4360

The Core i3-4360 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,639 points. Launch price was $352.

Xeon W3580

The Xeon W3580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,638 points. Launch price was $215.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4360 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon W3580 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon W3580 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i3-4360 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon W3580 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-4360 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The Core i3-4360 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon W3580 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4360 scores 3,639 against the Xeon W3580's 3,638 — a 0% lead for the Core i3-4360. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4360 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W3580.

Feature	Core i3-4360	Xeon W3580
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+3%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+11%	3.33 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark	3,639	3,638
Geekbench 6 Single	1,128	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4360 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3580 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-4360	Xeon W3580
Socket	LGA1150	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4360) / not specified (Xeon W3580). The Core i3-4360 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon W3580 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4360 targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-4360 rivals Core i3-6100.