Celeron G6900T vs Core i3-4360

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G6900T vs Core i3-4360 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G6900T vs Core i3-4360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G6900T

2022

Why buy it

✅+24.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 35W instead of 54W, a 19W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1150 and older memory support.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Core i3-4360 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i3-4360

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,128 vs 1,400).
❌Lower PassMark (3,639 vs 3,668).
❌54.3% higher power demand at 54W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1150, while Celeron G6900T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G6900T better than Core i3-4360?

Yes. Celeron G6900T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G6900T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G6900T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G6900T is the better buy right now. Celeron G6900T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (87.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G6900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2014), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1150, and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G6900T vs Core i3-4360 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900T

The Celeron G6900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 3,668 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-4360

The Core i3-4360 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,639 points. Launch price was $352.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-4360's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G6900T versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i3-4360 — a 27.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-4360 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Celeron G6900T uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i3-4360 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900T scores 3,668 against the Core i3-4360's 3,639 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron G6900T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,400 vs 1,128, a 21.5% lead for the Celeron G6900T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron G6900T	Core i3-4360
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	3.7 GHz+32%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.7 GHz+32%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,668	3,639
Geekbench 6 Single	1,400+24%	1,128
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,450	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i3-4360 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900T versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4360 — the Celeron G6900T supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G6900T supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Celeron G6900T) vs 16 (Core i3-4360) — the Celeron G6900T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760 (Celeron G6900T) and H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4360).

Feature	Celeron G6900T	Core i3-4360
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+200%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+300%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20+25%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron G6900T) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4360). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 710 (Celeron G6900T) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4360) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900T targets Low Power Desktop, Core i3-4360 targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900T rivals Pentium Gold G7400T; Core i3-4360 rivals Core i3-6100.

Feature	Celeron G6900T	Core i3-4360
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 710	HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, EPT
Target Use	Low Power Desktop	Mainstream Desktop