Celeron G6900T vs FX-6100

Celeron G6900T vs FX-6100 Performance Spectrum

Celeron G6900T

2 / 2

3,668

0.0%

3,686

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G6900T vs FX-6100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G6900T vs FX-6100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G6900T

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $123 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $165 MSRP).
✅Delivers 290.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 87.3 vs 22.3 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $165 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM3+ and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,668 vs 3,686).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

FX-6100

2011

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.3 vs 87.3 PassMark/$ ($165 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on AM3+, while Celeron G6900T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G6900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G6900T.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-6100 better than Celeron G6900T?

Yes. FX-6100 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-6100 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-6100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-6100 is still the faster CPU overall, but Celeron G6900T is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. FX-6100 comes in 292.9% more expensive on MSRP at $165 MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G6900T is also 290.9% better value on MSRP (87.3 vs 22.3 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Celeron G6900T can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G6900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2011) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM3+. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G6900T vs FX-6100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900T

The Celeron G6900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 3,668 points. Launch price was $69.

FX-6100

The FX-6100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,686 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the FX-6100 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6100 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G6900T versus 3.9 GHz on the FX-6100 — a 32.8% clock advantage for the FX-6100 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Celeron G6900T uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the FX-6100 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900T scores 3,668 against the FX-6100's 3,686 — a 0.5% lead for the FX-6100. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900T vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-6100.

Feature	Celeron G6900T	FX-6100
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	6 / 6+200%
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	3.9 GHz+39%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.3 GHz+18%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	6 MB+380%
Process	Intel 7 nm-78%	32 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark	3,668	3,686
Geekbench 6 Single	1,400	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,450	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the FX-6100 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G6900T	FX-6100
Socket	LGA1700	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+150%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron G6900T) / not specified (FX-6100). The Celeron G6900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 710), while the FX-6100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900T rivals Pentium Gold G7400T.

Feature	Celeron G6900T	FX-6100
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 710	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Low Power Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G6900T was priced at $42, while the FX-6100 came in at $165. On launch pricing ($42 vs $165), Celeron G6900T was $123 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G6900T delivers 87.3 pts/$ vs 22.3 pts/$ for the FX-6100 — making the Celeron G6900T the 118.5% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G6900T	FX-6100
MSRP	$42-75%	$165
Performance per Dollar	87.3+291%	22.3
Release Date	2022	2011

Search Celeron G6900T on Amazon

Search FX-6100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.