Celeron G6900T vs Core i5-2320

Intel

Celeron G6900T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2022
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-2320

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······

Celeron G6900T vs Core i5-2320 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G6900T vs Core i5-2320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G6900T vs Core i5-2320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G6900T

2022

Why buy it

  • +150% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
  • Costs $135 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $177 MSRP).
  • Delivers 319.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 87.3 vs 20.8 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $177 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1155 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (3,668 vs 3,688).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).

Core i5-2320

2011

Why buy it

  • +0.5% higher PassMark.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (560 vs 1,400).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.8 vs 87.3 PassMark/$ ($177 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
  • 171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
  • Older platform position on LGA1155, while Celeron G6900T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G6900T better than Core i5-2320?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G6900T is ahead with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-2320 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Core i5-2320 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-2320 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron G6900T is the better buy right now. Celeron G6900T comes in $135 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $177 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-2320 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 319.1% better value on MSRP (87.3 vs 20.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G6900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2011) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1155. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G6900T vs Core i5-2320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron G6900T

The Celeron G6900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 3,668 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-2320

The Core i5-2320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,688 points. Launch price was $160.

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-2320 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-2320 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G6900T versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-2320 — a 16.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-2320 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Celeron G6900T uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-2320 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900T scores 3,668 against the Core i5-2320's 3,688 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-2320. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,400 vs 560, a 85.7% lead for the Celeron G6900T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900T vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-2320.

FeatureCeleron G6900TCore i5-2320
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
3.3 GHz+18%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
3 GHz+7%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+400%
256 kB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm-78%
32 nm
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
3,668
3,688
Geekbench 6 Single
1,400+150%
560
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,450
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-2320 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900T versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-2320 — the Celeron G6900T supports 260.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G6900T supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Celeron G6900T) vs 16 (Core i5-2320) — the Celeron G6900T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760 (Celeron G6900T) and H61,H67,P67,Z68,B75,Z77 (Core i5-2320).

FeatureCeleron G6900TCore i5-2320
Socket
LGA1700
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+150%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800+260%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+300%
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
20+25%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron G6900T) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i5-2320). Both include integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics 710 (Celeron G6900T) and HD Graphics 2000 (Core i5-2320) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900T targets Low Power Desktop, Core i5-2320 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900T rivals Pentium Gold G7400T; Core i5-2320 rivals Phenom II X4 965.

FeatureCeleron G6900TCore i5-2320
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 710
HD Graphics 2000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Low Power Desktop
Legacy Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G6900T was priced at $42, while the Core i5-2320 came in at $177. On launch pricing ($42 vs $177), Celeron G6900T was $135 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G6900T delivers 87.3 pts/$ vs 20.8 pts/$ for the Core i5-2320 — making the Celeron G6900T the 122.9% better value option.

FeatureCeleron G6900TCore i5-2320
MSRP
$42-76%
$177
Performance per Dollar
87.3+320%
20.8
Release Date
2022
2011

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.