Celeron G6900T vs Xeon Platinum 8452Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G6900T vs Xeon Platinum 8452Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G6900T vs Xeon Platinum 8452Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G6900T

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 300W, a 265W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 710, while Xeon Platinum 8452Y needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Xeon Platinum 8452Y.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8452Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 68 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8452Y, which brings 36 cores / 72 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Xeon Platinum 8452Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Platinum 8452Y

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+1587.5% larger total L3 cache (68 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 36 cores / 72 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,641 vs 3,668).
❌757.1% higher power demand at 300W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G6900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G6900T.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G6900T better than Xeon Platinum 8452Y?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Platinum 8452Y makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron G6900T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G6900T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G6900T is the better buy right now. Celeron G6900T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8452Y is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 18.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (87.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8452Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022) and 1587.5% larger total L3 cache (68 MB vs 4 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G6900T vs Xeon Platinum 8452Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900T

The Celeron G6900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 3,668 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon Platinum 8452Y

The Xeon Platinum 8452Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 36 cores and 72 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 67.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,641 points. Launch price was $3,995.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8452Y offers 36 cores / 72 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8452Y has 34 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G6900T versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8452Y — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8452Y (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron G6900T uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8452Y uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900T scores 3,668 against the Xeon Platinum 8452Y's 3,641 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron G6900T. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900T vs 67.5 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8452Y.

Feature	Celeron G6900T	Xeon Platinum 8452Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	36 / 72+1700%
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	3.2 GHz+14%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+40%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	67.5 MB+1588%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	3,668	3,641
Geekbench 6 Single	1,400	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,450	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8452Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G6900T	Xeon Platinum 8452Y
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron G6900T) / not specified (Xeon Platinum 8452Y). The Celeron G6900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 710), while the Xeon Platinum 8452Y requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900T rivals Pentium Gold G7400T.