Core i3-4360 vs Core i7-6567U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4360 vs Core i7-6567U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4360 vs Core i7-6567U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4360

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Core i7-6567U needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-6567U.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,639 vs 3,680).
❌92.9% higher power demand at 54W vs 28W.

Core i7-6567U

2015

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 28W instead of 54W, a 26W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4360 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4360 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4360.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-6567U better than Core i3-4360?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-4360 is ahead with a 5.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6567U pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6567U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-6567U still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-6567U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-6567U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4360 vs Core i7-6567U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4360

The Core i3-4360 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,639 points. Launch price was $352.

Core i7-6567U

The Core i7-6567U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,680 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-4360 and Core i7-6567U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i3-4360 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-6567U — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-4360 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i3-4360 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-6567U uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4360 scores 3,639 against the Core i7-6567U's 3,680 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-6567U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4360 vs 4 MB on the Core i7-6567U.

Feature	Core i3-4360	Core i7-6567U
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+3%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+12%	3.3 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	3,639	3,680+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,128	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4360 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-6567U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-4360	Core i7-6567U
Socket	LGA1150	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4360) / not specified (Core i7-6567U). The Core i3-4360 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i7-6567U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4360 targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-4360 rivals Core i3-6100.