Core i5-7360U vs Xeon E3-1220

Intel

Core i5-7360U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E3-1220

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-7360U vs Xeon E3-1220 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-7360U vs Xeon E3-1220 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-7360U vs Xeon E3-1220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-7360U

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 80W, a 65W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, while Xeon E3-1220 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (3,823 vs 3,859).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1220, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.

Xeon E3-1220

2011

Why buy it

  • +0.9% higher PassMark.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

  • 433.3% higher power demand at 80W vs 15W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7360U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-7360U better than Xeon E3-1220?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1220 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-7360U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1220 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-7360U still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-7360U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-7360U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-7360U vs Xeon E3-1220 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-7360U

The Core i5-7360U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,823 points. Launch price was $304.

Intel

Xeon E3-1220

The Xeon E3-1220 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,859 points. Launch price was $395.

Processing Power

The Core i5-7360U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E3-1220 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E3-1220 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-7360U versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1220 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-7360U (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-7360U uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1220 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7360U scores 3,823 against the Xeon E3-1220's 3,859 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E3-1220. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i5-7360U vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1220.

FeatureCore i5-7360UXeon E3-1220
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+6%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
3.1 GHz+35%
L3 Cache
4 MB
8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
3,823
3,859
Geekbench 6 Single
1,112
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,096
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-7360U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1220 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-7360UXeon E3-1220
Socket
BGA1356
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-7360U) / not specified (Xeon E3-1220). The Core i5-7360U includes integrated graphics (Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640), while the Xeon E3-1220 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7360U targets Ultrabook.

FeatureCore i5-7360UXeon E3-1220
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Ultrabook