
Core i5-2400
Popular choices:

Core i5-7360U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-2400
2011Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-7360U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (595 vs 1,112).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $184 MSRP, while Core i5-7360U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
Core i5-7360U
2017Why buy it
- ✅+86.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,823 vs 3,870).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-2400.
Core i5-2400
2011Core i5-7360U
2017Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-7360U.
Why buy it
- ✅+86.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (595 vs 1,112).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $184 MSRP, while Core i5-7360U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,823 vs 3,870).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-2400.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-7360U better than Core i5-2400?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-2400 | Core i5-7360U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-2400 | Core i5-7360U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 28 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-2400 | Core i5-7360U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-2400 | Core i5-7360U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-2400 and Core i5-7360U

Core i5-2400
Core i5-2400
The Core i5-2400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,870 points. Launch price was $60.

Core i5-7360U
Core i5-7360U
The Core i5-7360U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,823 points. Launch price was $304.
Processing Power
The Core i5-2400 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-7360U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-2400 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-2400 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-7360U — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-7360U (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-2400 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-7360U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2400 scores 3,870 against the Core i5-7360U's 3,823 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-2400. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 595 vs 1,112, a 60.6% lead for the Core i5-7360U that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2400 vs 4 MB on the Core i5-7360U.
| Feature | Core i5-2400 | Core i5-7360U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+35% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6144 kB (total)+50% | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512 kB+100% |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 3,870+1% | 3,823 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 595 | 1,112+87% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,096 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-2400 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-7360U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-2400 versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-7360U — the Core i5-7360U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-2400) vs 12 (Core i5-7360U) — the Core i5-2400 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,H67,P67,Z68,B75,Z77 (Core i5-2400) and Sunrise Point-LP (Core i5-7360U).
| Feature | Core i5-2400 | Core i5-7360U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | BGA1356 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR4-2133+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+33% | 12 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-2400) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-7360U). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 2000 (Core i5-2400) and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 (Core i5-7360U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2400 targets Legacy Desktop, Core i5-7360U targets Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i5-2400 rivals Phenom II X4 975.
| Feature | Core i5-2400 | Core i5-7360U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 2000 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | Ultrabook |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













