
Core i5-2400

Ryzen Embedded R2312
Core i5-2400 vs Ryzen Embedded R2312 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-2400 vs Ryzen Embedded R2312 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-2400 vs Ryzen Embedded R2312: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-2400
2011Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 2000, while Ryzen Embedded R2312 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Embedded R2312.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,870 vs 3,952).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.0 vs 26.3 PassMark/$ ($184 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
Ryzen Embedded R2312
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $34 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $184 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.3 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $184 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-2400 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-2400.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Embedded R2312 better than Core i5-2400?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-2400 vs Ryzen Embedded R2312 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-2400
The Core i5-2400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,870 points. Launch price was $60.


Ryzen Embedded R2312
The Ryzen Embedded R2312 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 June 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,952 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-2400 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R2312 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-2400 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-2400 versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R2312 — a 2.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded R2312 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-2400 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R2312 uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2400 scores 3,870 against the Ryzen Embedded R2312's 3,952 — a 2.1% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R2312. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2400 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R2312.
| Feature | Core i5-2400 | Ryzen Embedded R2312 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+15% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6144 kB (total)+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 32 nm | 12 nm-63% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
| PassMark | 3,870 | 3,952+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 595 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-2400 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R2312 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-2400 | Ryzen Embedded R2312 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-2400) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded R2312). The Core i5-2400 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2000), while the Ryzen Embedded R2312 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2400 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-2400 rivals Phenom II X4 975.
| Feature | Core i5-2400 | Ryzen Embedded R2312 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 2000 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-2400 was priced at $184, while the Ryzen Embedded R2312 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($184 vs $150), Ryzen Embedded R2312 was $34 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-2400 delivers 21.0 pts/$ vs 26.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded R2312 — making the Ryzen Embedded R2312 the 22.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-2400 | Ryzen Embedded R2312 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $184 | $150-18% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.0 | 26.3+25% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















