Core i5-2400 vs Processor N200

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-2400 vs Processor N200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-2400 vs Processor N200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-2400

2011

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 2000, while Processor N200 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Processor N200.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,870 vs 3,937).
❌Launch MSRP is still $184 MSRP, while Processor N200 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on LGA1155, while Processor N200 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Processor N200

2023

Why buy it

✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1155 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-2400 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-2400.

Quick Answers

So, is Processor N200 better than Core i5-2400?

Yes. Processor N200 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Processor N200 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Processor N200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Processor N200 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Processor N200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $184 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-2400 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (21.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Processor N200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2011), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of LGA1155, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-2400 vs Processor N200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-2400

The Core i5-2400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,870 points. Launch price was $60.

Processor N200

The Processor N200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,937 points. Launch price was $193.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-2400 and Processor N200 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-2400 versus 3.7 GHz on the Processor N200 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Processor N200 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 0.1 GHz). The Core i5-2400 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Processor N200 uses Alder Lake-N (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2400 scores 3,870 against the Processor N200's 3,937 — a 1.7% lead for the Processor N200. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2400 vs 6 MB (total) on the Processor N200.

Feature	Core i5-2400	Processor N200
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.7 GHz+9%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+3000%	0.1 GHz
L3 Cache	6144 kB (total)	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2 MB (total)+700%
Process	32 nm	10 nm-69%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Alder Lake-N (2023)
PassMark	3,870	3,937+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	595	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2400 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Processor N200 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-2400	Processor N200
Socket	LGA1155	FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 5.0+150%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-2400) / not specified (Processor N200). The Core i5-2400 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2000), while the Processor N200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2400 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-2400 rivals Phenom II X4 975.