
Core i5-2400

Xeon E3-1225
Core i5-2400 vs Xeon E3-1225 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-2400 vs Xeon E3-1225 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-2400 vs Xeon E3-1225: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-2400
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($184 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 20.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.0 vs 17.4 PassMark/$ ($184 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 2000, while Xeon E3-1225 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E3-1225.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,870 vs 3,903).
Xeon E3-1225
2011Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.4 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($224 MSRP vs $184 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-2400 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-2400.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E3-1225 better than Core i5-2400?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-2400 vs Xeon E3-1225 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-2400
The Core i5-2400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,870 points. Launch price was $60.

Xeon E3-1225
The Xeon E3-1225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,903 points. Launch price was $150.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-2400 and Xeon E3-1225 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-2400 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1225 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). Both are built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-2400 scores 3,870 against the Xeon E3-1225's 3,903 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E3-1225. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2400 vs 6 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1225.
| Feature | Core i5-2400 | Xeon E3-1225 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6144 kB (total) | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 3,870 | 3,903 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 595 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1155 socket with PCIe 2.0.
| Feature | Core i5-2400 | Xeon E3-1225 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-2400) / not specified (Xeon E3-1225). The Core i5-2400 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2000), while the Xeon E3-1225 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2400 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-2400 rivals Phenom II X4 975.
| Feature | Core i5-2400 | Xeon E3-1225 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 2000 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-2400 was priced at $184, while the Xeon E3-1225 came in at $224. On launch pricing ($184 vs $224), Core i5-2400 was $40 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-2400 delivers 21.0 pts/$ vs 17.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1225 — making the Core i5-2400 the 18.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-2400 | Xeon E3-1225 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $184-18% | $224 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.0+21% | 17.4 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















