Core i5-2400
VS
Core i5-7260U

Core i5-2400 vs Core i5-7260U

Intel

Core i5-2400

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i5-7260U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-2400 is positioned at rank 772 and the Core i5-7260U is on rank 297, so the Core i5-7260U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2400

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14822%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14006%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10169%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3064%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2427%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2123%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1216%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1200%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1093%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1093%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1080%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1051%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1036%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1032%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1023%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
100%
#772
Core i5-2400
MSRP: $184|Avg: $25
100%
#773
Core i7-5775C
MSRP: $366|Avg: $150
100%
#775
Pentium G2140
MSRP: $100|Avg: $95
99%
#776
Core i7-4790T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $102
99%
#777
Core i5-2320
MSRP: $177|Avg: $22
99%
#778
Celeron E3500
MSRP: $62|Avg: $10
99%
#779
Pentium G2030
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
99%
#780
Athlon II X2 260
MSRP: $60|Avg: $12
99%
#781
Athlon II X3 445
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#783
Core i5-2310
MSRP: $177|Avg: $12
98%
#784
Core i5-5675C
MSRP: $276|Avg: $66
98%
#785
Core i5-2380P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $25
98%
#786
Core i5-4690
MSRP: $272|Avg: $120
98%
#787
FX-6120
MSRP: $188|Avg: $54
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-7260U

#86
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
100%
#285
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
445%
#286
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
439%
#287
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
403%
#288
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
401%
#289
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
397%
#291
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
384%
#292
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
368%
#293
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
367%
#294
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
357%
#297
Core i5-7260U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-7260U (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-2400Core i5-7260U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-2400 (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-2400Core i5-7260U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-2400 and Core i5-7260U

Intel

Core i5-2400

The Core i5-2400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,870 points. Launch price was $60.

Intel

Core i5-7260U

The Core i5-7260U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,953 points. Launch price was $304.

Processing Power

The Core i5-2400 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-7260U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-2400 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-2400 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-7260U — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-2400 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-7260U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2400 scores 3,870 against the Core i5-7260U's 3,953 — a 2.1% lead for the Core i5-7260U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 595 vs 1,192, a 66.8% lead for the Core i5-7260U that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2400 vs 4 MB on the Core i5-7260U.

FeatureCore i5-2400Core i5-7260U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+41%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
6144 kB (total)+50%
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
3,870
3,953+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
595
1,192+100%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2400 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-7260U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-2400 versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-7260U — the Core i5-7260U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-2400) vs 12 (Core i5-7260U) — the Core i5-2400 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,H67,P67,Z68,B75,Z77 (Core i5-2400) and Kaby Lake-U (Core i5-7260U).

FeatureCore i5-2400Core i5-7260U
Socket
LGA1155
BGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR4-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 2000 (Core i5-2400) and Iris Plus Graphics 640 (Core i5-7260U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2400 targets Legacy Desktop, Core i5-7260U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-2400 rivals Phenom II X4 975; Core i5-7260U rivals A12-9720P.

FeatureCore i5-2400Core i5-7260U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 2000
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Legacy Desktop
Mainstream Laptop