
Core i5-2400

FX-6120
Core i5-2400 vs FX-6120 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-2400 vs FX-6120 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-2400 vs FX-6120: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-2400
2011Why buy it
- β +0.4% higher PassMark.
- β Costs $4 less on MSRP ($184 MSRP vs $188 MSRP).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 2000, while FX-6120 needs a discrete GPU.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike FX-6120.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-6120 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βSmaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
FX-6120
2012Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (3,853 vs 3,870).
- β2.2% HIGHER MSRP$188 MSRPvs$184 MSRP
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-2400 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-2400.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-2400 better than FX-6120?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-2400 vs FX-6120 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-2400
The Core i5-2400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,870 points. Launch price was $60.

FX-6120
The FX-6120 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011β2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,853 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-2400 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-6120 offers 6 cores / 6 threads β the FX-6120 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-2400 versus 4.2 GHz on the FX-6120 β a 21.1% clock advantage for the FX-6120 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-2400 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) architecture (32 nm), while the FX-6120 uses Zambezi (2011β2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2400 scores 3,870 against the FX-6120's 3,853 β a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-2400. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2400 vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-6120.
| Feature | Core i5-2400 | FX-6120 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 6+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz+24% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.6 GHz+16% |
| L3 Cache | 6144 kB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 6 MB+2300% |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) | Zambezi (2011β2012) |
| PassMark | 3,870 | 3,853 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 595 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-2400 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the FX-6120 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-2400 | FX-6120 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-2400) / not specified (FX-6120). The Core i5-2400 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2000), while the FX-6120 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2400 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-2400 rivals Phenom II X4 975.
| Feature | Core i5-2400 | FX-6120 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 2000 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | β |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-2400 was priced at $184, while the FX-6120 came in at $188. On launch pricing ($184 vs $188), Core i5-2400 was $4 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-2400 delivers 21.0 pts/$ vs 20.5 pts/$ for the FX-6120 β making the Core i5-2400 the 2.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-2400 | FX-6120 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $184-2% | $188 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.0+2% | 20.5 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















