
Core i5-7500

Opteron 6282 SE
Core i5-7500 vs Opteron 6282 SE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-7500 vs Opteron 6282 SE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-7500 vs Opteron 6282 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-7500
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $820 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $1,019 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 410.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.0 vs 6.3 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $1,019 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Opteron 6282 SE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6282 SE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,362 vs 6,385).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6282 SE, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.
Opteron 6282 SE
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 32.0 PassMark/$ ($1,019 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Opteron 6282 SE better than Core i5-7500?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-7500 vs Opteron 6282 SE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-7500
The Core i5-7500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,362 points. Launch price was $202.

Opteron 6282 SE
The Opteron 6282 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,385 points. Launch price was $1,090.
Processing Power
The Core i5-7500 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 6282 SE offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6282 SE has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-7500 versus 3.3 GHz on the Opteron 6282 SE — a 14.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-7500 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-7500 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 6282 SE uses Interlagos (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7500 scores 6,362 against the Opteron 6282 SE's 6,385 — a 0.4% lead for the Opteron 6282 SE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7500 vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6282 SE.
| Feature | Core i5-7500 | Opteron 6282 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 16 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+15% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+31% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+12700% | 2 MB (per module) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Interlagos (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 6,362 | 6,385 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-7500 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6282 SE uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-7500 | Opteron 6282 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | G34 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-7500) / not specified (Opteron 6282 SE). The Core i5-7500 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Opteron 6282 SE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7500 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-7500 | Opteron 6282 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-7500 was priced at $199, while the Opteron 6282 SE came in at $1019. On launch pricing ($199 vs $1019), Core i5-7500 was $820 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-7500 delivers 32.0 pts/$ vs 6.3 pts/$ for the Opteron 6282 SE — making the Core i5-7500 the 134.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-7500 | Opteron 6282 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-80% | $1019 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.0+408% | 6.3 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















